The birth of myth

BIRTH OF MYTH

The certificated data of modern human established nearly 36000 years old.
We have history nearly 5000 Bc. Evidencesd in egypt. The abrahim religions have evidences of their prophets or we can say that the evidences of faith and no place for the myths. If they have myths but not religions related.
And now we come at the babri mosque and pagans'so called temple . All historical characters have evidences but so called gods of two epics ramayan and mahabharat actors .
A prominent author of hindu Tulsidas reinvented ramayan as ramcharit manas in same era of babri mosque and no reported about the finishing so called temple by babur king for the place of mosque.
The claim for the greatest democracy of USA is great because their democracy not drive by faith as our.
All we know that the head of USA mr Barak obama supported mosque on ground zero despite of anti islam protested because their country drives by law and rules but no space for the faith.
By the judgement a miracle of indian court is the certificat of birth given to non evidenced lord rama but failed for the death certificate . The world miracle cannot be seen in any country.
These judges declared just space where rama mother's delivery for the birth of lord rama or the now place where rama idol stand. They weighted faith and myth against evidences.
They rejected muslim's evidenced faith the king babur who built the mosque ,was a great religious muslim who awared about the sin of breaking worshipers places of non muslims for the mosque.
The indian students who read the story in primary classes about the babur's prayer accepted by the GOD for the exchange life of his illnessed son Humayu.babur could not mind about built a mosque over others worships places.
ASI green singled for the temple's organs on which the babri mosque stood or built by breaking temple . By these evidences the court justified the claim of rama's birth and the same ASI Rejected the claim of rama setu or bridge as man made. So we can say that when
The ASI failed to prove rama bridge on the base of evidences then why has ASI claimed the temple on the base of faith without any evidences ?