*Kiss*.......*Kiss*
*Kiss*.....*Kiss*
*Kiss*...*Kiss*
*Kiss**Kiss*
*Kiss*...*Kiss*
*Kiss*.....*Kiss*
*Kiss*.......*Kiss*
*Kiss*.........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
........*Kiss*
.........*Kiss*
...*Kiss*...*Kiss*
.*Kiss*.......*Kiss*
...*Kiss*......*Kiss*
......*Kiss*
...........*Kiss*
*Kiss*......*Kiss*
.*Kiss*.......*Kiss*
...*Kiss*...*Kiss*
.........*Kiss*
.........*Kiss*
...*Kiss*...*Kiss*
.*Kiss*.......*Kiss*
...*Kiss*......*Kiss*
......*Kiss*
...........*Kiss*
*Kiss*......*Kiss*
.*Kiss*.......*Kiss*
...*Kiss*...*Kiss*
.........*Kiss
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
A true conspiracy
Australian Prime Minister
Julia Gillard on Wednesday
dismissed as "stupid and
wrong" a trade union
leader's remarks that the
September 11, 2001 terror
attacks in the US were a
conspiracy.
Kevin Bracken, the secretary
of the Maritime Union of
Australia and Victorian
Trades Hall Council (VTHC)
president, on Wednesday
asked for a fresh inquiry into
the 9/11 attacks, claiming
the "official story doesn't
stand up to scientific
scrutiny".
Bracken, who has earlier
faced criticism for comparing
US anti-terrorism law with
"civic controls" imposed by
German Nazi dictator Adolf
Hitler, claimed that elements
of the then US government
led by President George W.
Bush, military personnel and
security services were
involved in the attacks.
However, VTHC secretary
Brian Boyd distanced unions
from Bracken's views, the
Australian reported.
The Opposition opened
parliamentary question time
on the matter on
Wednesday, with Victorian
MP Josh Frydenberg asking
the Prime Minister what
action she would take
against Bracken "to send a
message that such remarks
are unacceptable".
"Obviously I don't agree with
the remarks, obviously they
are stupid and wrong,"
Gillard said.
"The Labor Party is a large
organisation, people join it
as individuals — we don't
dictate what people think."
After being accused by
Liberal frontbencher
Christopher Pyne of not
answering the question on
discipline, Gillard said: "If it is
the intention of the leader of
Opposition to expel every
member who says something
stupid, I'll start sending him a
weekly list."
Bracken told the Australian
Online on Wednesday that
aviation fuel from the
hijacked planes that crashed
into the Twin Towers in New
York would not have been
hot enough to melt steel,
and no high-rise steel-
framed building before or
after September 11, 2001,
had collapsed due to fire.
VTHC secretary Boyd said
Bracken, who aired his views
to ABC radio's Jon Faine,
should not have identified
himself as Trades Hall
president when speaking
about the 9/11 attacks. The
vast majority of unions
condemned the events of
9/11 as terrorist attacks, and
resolutions cited by Bracken
did not endorse his views,
Boyd said.
Bracken faced flak for his
views in 2006 when he
claimed the anti-terror laws
introduced by the US and its
allies, including Australia,
were similar to the "civic
controls" imposed by Hitler
in 1933.
Julia Gillard on Wednesday
dismissed as "stupid and
wrong" a trade union
leader's remarks that the
September 11, 2001 terror
attacks in the US were a
conspiracy.
Kevin Bracken, the secretary
of the Maritime Union of
Australia and Victorian
Trades Hall Council (VTHC)
president, on Wednesday
asked for a fresh inquiry into
the 9/11 attacks, claiming
the "official story doesn't
stand up to scientific
scrutiny".
Bracken, who has earlier
faced criticism for comparing
US anti-terrorism law with
"civic controls" imposed by
German Nazi dictator Adolf
Hitler, claimed that elements
of the then US government
led by President George W.
Bush, military personnel and
security services were
involved in the attacks.
However, VTHC secretary
Brian Boyd distanced unions
from Bracken's views, the
Australian reported.
The Opposition opened
parliamentary question time
on the matter on
Wednesday, with Victorian
MP Josh Frydenberg asking
the Prime Minister what
action she would take
against Bracken "to send a
message that such remarks
are unacceptable".
"Obviously I don't agree with
the remarks, obviously they
are stupid and wrong,"
Gillard said.
"The Labor Party is a large
organisation, people join it
as individuals — we don't
dictate what people think."
After being accused by
Liberal frontbencher
Christopher Pyne of not
answering the question on
discipline, Gillard said: "If it is
the intention of the leader of
Opposition to expel every
member who says something
stupid, I'll start sending him a
weekly list."
Bracken told the Australian
Online on Wednesday that
aviation fuel from the
hijacked planes that crashed
into the Twin Towers in New
York would not have been
hot enough to melt steel,
and no high-rise steel-
framed building before or
after September 11, 2001,
had collapsed due to fire.
VTHC secretary Boyd said
Bracken, who aired his views
to ABC radio's Jon Faine,
should not have identified
himself as Trades Hall
president when speaking
about the 9/11 attacks. The
vast majority of unions
condemned the events of
9/11 as terrorist attacks, and
resolutions cited by Bracken
did not endorse his views,
Boyd said.
Bracken faced flak for his
views in 2006 when he
claimed the anti-terror laws
introduced by the US and its
allies, including Australia,
were similar to the "civic
controls" imposed by Hitler
in 1933.
A true conspiracy
Australian Prime Minister
Julia Gillard on Wednesday
dismissed as "stupid and
wrong" a trade union
leader's remarks that the
September 11, 2001 terror
attacks in the US were a
conspiracy.
Kevin Bracken, the secretary
of the Maritime Union of
Australia and Victorian
Trades Hall Council (VTHC)
president, on Wednesday
asked for a fresh inquiry into
the 9/11 attacks, claiming
the "official story doesn't
stand up to scientific
scrutiny".
Bracken, who has earlier
faced criticism for comparing
US anti-terrorism law with
"civic controls" imposed by
German Nazi dictator Adolf
Hitler, claimed that elements
of the then US government
led by President George W.
Bush, military personnel and
security services were
involved in the attacks.
However, VTHC secretary
Brian Boyd distanced unions
from Bracken's views, the
Australian reported.
The Opposition opened
parliamentary question time
on the matter on
Wednesday, with Victorian
MP Josh Frydenberg asking
the Prime Minister what
action she would take
against Bracken "to send a
message that such remarks
are unacceptable".
"Obviously I don't agree with
the remarks, obviously they
are stupid and wrong,"
Gillard said.
"The Labor Party is a large
organisation, people join it
as individuals — we don't
dictate what people think."
After being accused by
Liberal frontbencher
Christopher Pyne of not
answering the question on
discipline, Gillard said: "If it is
the intention of the leader of
Opposition to expel every
member who says something
stupid, I'll start sending him a
weekly list."
Bracken told the Australian
Online on Wednesday that
aviation fuel from the
hijacked planes that crashed
into the Twin Towers in New
York would not have been
hot enough to melt steel,
and no high-rise steel-
framed building before or
after September 11, 2001,
had collapsed due to fire.
VTHC secretary Boyd said
Bracken, who aired his views
to ABC radio's Jon Faine,
should not have identified
himself as Trades Hall
president when speaking
about the 9/11 attacks. The
vast majority of unions
condemned the events of
9/11 as terrorist attacks, and
resolutions cited by Bracken
did not endorse his views,
Boyd said.
Bracken faced flak for his
views in 2006 when he
claimed the anti-terror laws
introduced by the US and its
allies, including Australia,
were similar to the "civic
controls" imposed by Hitler
in 1933.
Julia Gillard on Wednesday
dismissed as "stupid and
wrong" a trade union
leader's remarks that the
September 11, 2001 terror
attacks in the US were a
conspiracy.
Kevin Bracken, the secretary
of the Maritime Union of
Australia and Victorian
Trades Hall Council (VTHC)
president, on Wednesday
asked for a fresh inquiry into
the 9/11 attacks, claiming
the "official story doesn't
stand up to scientific
scrutiny".
Bracken, who has earlier
faced criticism for comparing
US anti-terrorism law with
"civic controls" imposed by
German Nazi dictator Adolf
Hitler, claimed that elements
of the then US government
led by President George W.
Bush, military personnel and
security services were
involved in the attacks.
However, VTHC secretary
Brian Boyd distanced unions
from Bracken's views, the
Australian reported.
The Opposition opened
parliamentary question time
on the matter on
Wednesday, with Victorian
MP Josh Frydenberg asking
the Prime Minister what
action she would take
against Bracken "to send a
message that such remarks
are unacceptable".
"Obviously I don't agree with
the remarks, obviously they
are stupid and wrong,"
Gillard said.
"The Labor Party is a large
organisation, people join it
as individuals — we don't
dictate what people think."
After being accused by
Liberal frontbencher
Christopher Pyne of not
answering the question on
discipline, Gillard said: "If it is
the intention of the leader of
Opposition to expel every
member who says something
stupid, I'll start sending him a
weekly list."
Bracken told the Australian
Online on Wednesday that
aviation fuel from the
hijacked planes that crashed
into the Twin Towers in New
York would not have been
hot enough to melt steel,
and no high-rise steel-
framed building before or
after September 11, 2001,
had collapsed due to fire.
VTHC secretary Boyd said
Bracken, who aired his views
to ABC radio's Jon Faine,
should not have identified
himself as Trades Hall
president when speaking
about the 9/11 attacks. The
vast majority of unions
condemned the events of
9/11 as terrorist attacks, and
resolutions cited by Bracken
did not endorse his views,
Boyd said.
Bracken faced flak for his
views in 2006 when he
claimed the anti-terror laws
introduced by the US and its
allies, including Australia,
were similar to the "civic
controls" imposed by Hitler
in 1933.
Monday, October 11, 2010
The birth of myth
BIRTH OF MYTH
The certificated data of modern human established nearly 36000 years old.
We have history nearly 5000 Bc. Evidencesd in egypt. The abrahim religions have evidences of their prophets or we can say that the evidences of faith and no place for the myths. If they have myths but not religions related.
And now we come at the babri mosque and pagans'so called temple . All historical characters have evidences but so called gods of two epics ramayan and mahabharat actors .
A prominent author of hindu Tulsidas reinvented ramayan as ramcharit manas in same era of babri mosque and no reported about the finishing so called temple by babur king for the place of mosque.
The claim for the greatest democracy of USA is great because their democracy not drive by faith as our.
All we know that the head of USA mr Barak obama supported mosque on ground zero despite of anti islam protested because their country drives by law and rules but no space for the faith.
By the judgement a miracle of indian court is the certificat of birth given to non evidenced lord rama but failed for the death certificate . The world miracle cannot be seen in any country.
These judges declared just space where rama mother's delivery for the birth of lord rama or the now place where rama idol stand. They weighted faith and myth against evidences.
They rejected muslim's evidenced faith the king babur who built the mosque ,was a great religious muslim who awared about the sin of breaking worshipers places of non muslims for the mosque.
The indian students who read the story in primary classes about the babur's prayer accepted by the GOD for the exchange life of his illnessed son Humayu.babur could not mind about built a mosque over others worships places.
ASI green singled for the temple's organs on which the babri mosque stood or built by breaking temple . By these evidences the court justified the claim of rama's birth and the same ASI Rejected the claim of rama setu or bridge as man made. So we can say that when
The ASI failed to prove rama bridge on the base of evidences then why has ASI claimed the temple on the base of faith without any evidences ?
The certificated data of modern human established nearly 36000 years old.
We have history nearly 5000 Bc. Evidencesd in egypt. The abrahim religions have evidences of their prophets or we can say that the evidences of faith and no place for the myths. If they have myths but not religions related.
And now we come at the babri mosque and pagans'so called temple . All historical characters have evidences but so called gods of two epics ramayan and mahabharat actors .
A prominent author of hindu Tulsidas reinvented ramayan as ramcharit manas in same era of babri mosque and no reported about the finishing so called temple by babur king for the place of mosque.
The claim for the greatest democracy of USA is great because their democracy not drive by faith as our.
All we know that the head of USA mr Barak obama supported mosque on ground zero despite of anti islam protested because their country drives by law and rules but no space for the faith.
By the judgement a miracle of indian court is the certificat of birth given to non evidenced lord rama but failed for the death certificate . The world miracle cannot be seen in any country.
These judges declared just space where rama mother's delivery for the birth of lord rama or the now place where rama idol stand. They weighted faith and myth against evidences.
They rejected muslim's evidenced faith the king babur who built the mosque ,was a great religious muslim who awared about the sin of breaking worshipers places of non muslims for the mosque.
The indian students who read the story in primary classes about the babur's prayer accepted by the GOD for the exchange life of his illnessed son Humayu.babur could not mind about built a mosque over others worships places.
ASI green singled for the temple's organs on which the babri mosque stood or built by breaking temple . By these evidences the court justified the claim of rama's birth and the same ASI Rejected the claim of rama setu or bridge as man made. So we can say that when
The ASI failed to prove rama bridge on the base of evidences then why has ASI claimed the temple on the base of faith without any evidences ?
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Fact never defacts
Prof Suraj Bhan, an
eminent archaeologist said
that there is no shred of
evidence to indicate a
temple existed before Babri
Masjid. On the contrary, the
excavation indicates Muslim
inhabitation in before any
temple or anything. Historian
Irfan Habib maintained that
there’s no evidence to
indicate that there was any
temple.
eminent archaeologist said
that there is no shred of
evidence to indicate a
temple existed before Babri
Masjid. On the contrary, the
excavation indicates Muslim
inhabitation in before any
temple or anything. Historian
Irfan Habib maintained that
there’s no evidence to
indicate that there was any
temple.
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Babri mosque demolished
01/10/2010
Verdict doesn't justify Babri
demolition: Chidambaram
New Delhi: Home Minister P.
Chidambaram Friday said
the judgment by the
Allahabad High Court on the
disputed Ayodhya site "in
no way" justified the 1992
demolition of the Babri
Mosque by some Hindu
fanatics.
"This judgment has nothing
to do with (demolition of
Babri mosque in) 1992... That
was, as found by the
Liberhan Commission,
completely unacceptable.
This judgment in no way
justifies the demolition of
the Babri Masjid. That
remains a criminal act,"
Chidambaram said.
Suppose but where are all criminals or killers of babri mosque and muslims ?
Where are ?
These babri mosque killers settled theirs lives in peacefully winds.
By this judgement,it has proved indirectly "the justified babri mosque demolished ".
So it is now easy for hindu hardliners recontinuue the rest demolishing mosque because they have broked some parts of mosque in 1992.
The judgement not a decision but a compromise which is lived in closed room. It can be exits same but more fairly for which the court fined on Tirpati's appel for the delay for solving these dispute out of court.
These judges weighted to faith and myth over the law and truths. They ignored that the country not drive thorough the faith and myth but constitute and law .
The justic isn't a game or a tournament which is won by 2 by 1 as these judgement came in light as 2 by 1.
A judge who have finished his terms of judge on 1st october proud on so called fair judgement claimed that the mosque built to break the temple and other judge said the the mosque built on the so called remaints temple not broked on the evidence of ASI.
A judge said that the muslim failed to prove about the manufeatuer of mosque whether he was the king Babur or his commander Mir baqi .he demanded evidences for but not faith of muslim who claimed Babur was builder although he weighted to the faith of the hindu faith who claimed the their so called god rama was born the same spot of the babri mosque .
The judgement proved that muslim in india are 2nd class citizens.
Two know more about the judgement of compromise click at
http://www.asianage.com/india/decision-hon’ble-special-full-bench-hearing-ayodhya-matters-264
We indian claim that our democracy is greatest and grade 1 in world . What ?
Verdict doesn't justify Babri
demolition: Chidambaram
New Delhi: Home Minister P.
Chidambaram Friday said
the judgment by the
Allahabad High Court on the
disputed Ayodhya site "in
no way" justified the 1992
demolition of the Babri
Mosque by some Hindu
fanatics.
"This judgment has nothing
to do with (demolition of
Babri mosque in) 1992... That
was, as found by the
Liberhan Commission,
completely unacceptable.
This judgment in no way
justifies the demolition of
the Babri Masjid. That
remains a criminal act,"
Chidambaram said.
Suppose but where are all criminals or killers of babri mosque and muslims ?
Where are ?
These babri mosque killers settled theirs lives in peacefully winds.
By this judgement,it has proved indirectly "the justified babri mosque demolished ".
So it is now easy for hindu hardliners recontinuue the rest demolishing mosque because they have broked some parts of mosque in 1992.
The judgement not a decision but a compromise which is lived in closed room. It can be exits same but more fairly for which the court fined on Tirpati's appel for the delay for solving these dispute out of court.
These judges weighted to faith and myth over the law and truths. They ignored that the country not drive thorough the faith and myth but constitute and law .
The justic isn't a game or a tournament which is won by 2 by 1 as these judgement came in light as 2 by 1.
A judge who have finished his terms of judge on 1st october proud on so called fair judgement claimed that the mosque built to break the temple and other judge said the the mosque built on the so called remaints temple not broked on the evidence of ASI.
A judge said that the muslim failed to prove about the manufeatuer of mosque whether he was the king Babur or his commander Mir baqi .he demanded evidences for but not faith of muslim who claimed Babur was builder although he weighted to the faith of the hindu faith who claimed the their so called god rama was born the same spot of the babri mosque .
The judgement proved that muslim in india are 2nd class citizens.
Two know more about the judgement of compromise click at
http://www.asianage.com/india/decision-hon’ble-special-full-bench-hearing-ayodhya-matters-264
We indian claim that our democracy is greatest and grade 1 in world . What ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)